Proud to
be White
I have been
wondering about why Whites are racists, and no other
race is.
"How many
are actually paying attention to this? There are
African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans,
Arab Americans, Jewish Americans, etc.
And then there are just
Americans.
You say that
whites commit a lot of violence against you. So why are
the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? You
have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin
Luther King Day. You have Black History Month.
You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashanah.
You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the
NAACP. You have BET.
If we had
WET (White Entertainment Television), we would be
racists. If we had a White Pride Day,
If we had
White History Month, we'd be racists. If we had any
organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives,
we'd be racists.
We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber
of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of
Commerce. I Wonder who pays for that?
A white
woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant,
but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in
the US. Yet if there were White
colleges', that would be a racist college. If we had a
college fund that only gave white students scholarships,
you know we'd be racists.
In the Million Man March, Blacks believed that they were
marching for their race and rights. If we marched for
our race and rights, you would call us racists.
You are
proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're
not afraid to announce it. But if we were to announce
our white pride, you'd call us racists.
You rob
us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white
police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a
black drug dealer
running from the law and posing a threat to society, you
call him a racist.
I am
proud to be white, but you call me a racist. Why
is it that only whites can be racists?
There is nothing improper about this question.
We 'white
folk' have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country
because we won't stand up for ourselves!
Because we're too
afraid of being branded "Racist".
I'M PROUD TO BE WHITE!
It's
not a crime YET ... but getting very close! And
what happened to MY First Amendment rights? I'm
here in Court today because I defended myself against
black hecklers who were interfering with my right to
freedom of speech which, by the way, had nothing to do
with race".
Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ
Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω Λ Ψ Ω
Λ Ψ Ω
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, June 7, 2010
Former NATO Secretary-General
and Bilderberg member Willy Claes has confounded claims
by debunkers that the secret organization which met in
Sitges Spain over the last few days does not set policy,
admitting during a Belgian radio interview that
Bilderberg attendees are mandated to implement decisions
that are formulated during the annual conference of
power brokers.
In a radio interview reported
on by the
Belgian news website
www.zonnewind.be, Claes told host Koen Fillet
that Bilderberg does indeed decide policy for the coming
year.
Claes would certainly be in a
position to know, being a two-time Bilderberg
attendee as well as the eighth Secretary General of NATO
from 1994 until 1995.
Claes said that Bilderberg
guests are normally given around 10 minutes of talk
time, after which a report is compiled of their
presentation.
“The participants are then
obviously considered to use this report in setting their
policies in the environments in which they affect,”
stated Claes, according to the translated text.
The host asked Claes to repeat
this astounding admission, before Claes went on to
explain that no two guest are allowed to sit next to
each other more than once at Bilderberg, to enable the
maximum exchange of views on important subjects.
A Dutch-speaking reader sent us
the article and confirms that the translation is
accurate. This represents a solid confirmation of what
we already knew through witnessing Bilderberg’s leaked
agenda later play out in the real world time after time
– that the elitist organization does verbally set global
policy in a completely undemocratic and illegal manner.
However, despite Claes,
who personally attended the 1994
Bilderberg meeting in Helsinki when he was Belgium’s
Minister for Foreign Affairs, confirming the
obvious that Bilderberg does manufacture a consensus
amongst its participants, which is then implemented as
policy in the real world, during the past few days
numerous debunkers have claimed that Bilderberg is just
a talking shop that has no impact on the global stage.
Iain Hollingshead of the London
Telegraph wrote a sophomoric piece in which
he dismissed Bilderberg as “a group of willy-waggling
old men comparing their security details and dreaming of
past glories,” which is a complete misnomer seeing as
Bilderberg is routinely attended by active Presidents
and Prime Ministers very much in power and very much in
a position to have an impact on current events, such as
Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, who
attended this year’s conference with his country on the
verge of becoming the next Greece.
Hollingshead claims that
because the group is becoming more well known, its
allure is on the wane, but fails to mention that this is
because of the fine work of activists and real
journalists who have spent decades trying to get the
castrated corporate media to report on the event while
people like Hollingshead either made childish jokes
about the whole issue or even denied the very existence
of Bilderberg.
One such “skeptic” is Chip
Berlet, who works for a group called the
Political Research Associates,
which is funded in part by the Ford
Foundation, founded by Edsel Ford, the son of the
notorious Henry Ford, who
received awards from Hitler
for
funding the Nazi war machine with
slave labor, which somewhat taints the PRA’s
stated objectives, which are apparently to track
conspiracy theories and the right-wing while “advancing
an open, democratic, and pluralistic society”.
The Ford Foundation is little
more than an attack dog which transnational elitists
use, through its offshoots like PRA, to demonize any
criticism of their agenda as extremist and anti-semitic,
which is quite rich considering the history of the
corporation.
Berlet himself has made a career
out of characterizing the idea that powerful people
might get together and discuss ways of expanding their
power as a belief of the lunatic fringe.
Little surprise therefore that
towards the end of Berlet’s appearance on Russia Today,
in which he stumbles through a broken record of excuses
claiming Bilderberg has no power, he invokes the tired
old cliche that anyone who expresses concern about 200
powerful men gathering in secret with no democratic
oversight whatsoever behind a wall of security is
probably a closet racist.
Berlet claims the American Free
Press was founded by “one of the biggest anti-semitic,
neo-fascist conspiracy theorists in the world,” which
coincidentally is also a pretty apt description of the
man who founded the company that now pays Berlet via the
Ford Foundation funding PRA receives to spew his
propaganda – Henry Ford – one of Hitler’s biggest
supporters.
